restoration-ease

Are you finding yourself with itchy, irritated skin that you can’t stop scratching? Or have you wondered why your child’s eczema is suddenly worse and so hard to control? Mounting evidence suggests that wildfires, which are increasing in intensity and frequency, contribute to skin problems, including eczema flares.

What is eczema?

Eczema is a common chronic skin condition that affects about one in 10 people in the US. Its hallmarks are inflamed and dry, itchy patches of skin.

Atopic dermatitis is the most common type of eczema. It can run in families, often beginning in childhood. Typically, in the northern hemisphere, it grows worse during the winter season when the weather is cold and drying. Now some experts are seeing that pattern change. At Massachusetts General Hospital, for example, one dermatologist noted an unusual spike last summer in patients with flare-ups of eczema.

Why is eczema getting worse during summer?

In 2023, Canada experienced more than 6,000 wildfires that burned over 16 million hectares of land — an area larger than the entire state of Georgia. While far away from the devastation, the smoke reached across the US and more than 2,000 miles to Europe. Poor air quality from these distant wildfires caused eye and throat irritation and difficulty breathing.

In Boston, Dr. Arianne Shadi Kourosh, a dermatologist at Massachusetts General Hospital, also began to notice skin symptoms. Normally the dermatology clinics would see fewer than 20 people during a summer month for eczema, including atopic dermatitis. Suddenly that jumped to 160.

Looking back at summer month records from the last four years, her research showed that the number of visits for these skin complaints tracked with the severity of air pollution. These findings are consistent with other research noting an uptick in eczema flares and psoriasis flares associated with wildfire pollution. But why?

Researchers theorize that airborne pollutants might set off a cascade of effects within the body by activating an oxidative stress pathway. This damages the skin barrier and prompts an inflammatory response. This cascade also may play a role in the development of eczema.

What can you do to protect your skin?

Air pollutants in wildfire smoke may harm multiple organs — not just your heart and lungs, but also our skin, it seems. So, when outdoor air quality is bad due to wildfires, limiting your exposure can help reduce health risks. While we can say the same for industrial air pollution, wildfire pollution is likely worse due to its additional toxic particles.

• Seek help if you’re itching. Check with a dermatologist or your health team if you think wildfire smoke or other forms of air pollution might be affecting your skin.
• Check local air quality.AirNow.gov shares local, real-time air quality information and activity guidance. When recommended, stay indoors if possible. Shut doors, windows, and any outdoor air intake vents.
• Protect your skin. When you’re outdoors, wear a mineral-based sunscreen containing zinc or titanium. While most other sunscreens work through a chemical reaction to absorb the ultraviolet (UV) rays that damage skin, zinc and titanium sunscreens help by forming a barrier over skin that reflects off UV rays. The barrier also reduces the amount of pollutant particles getting to the skin to set off the inflammatory cascade. Wearing sunscreen protects against skin cancer, as well.
• Wash up. After coming back inside, cleansing your skin and applying a hypoallergenic moisturizer will help keep it healthy. If you do have eczema, choose cleansers and moisturizing products recommended by your dermatologist or health care provider.

About the Author

Wynne Armand, MD, Contributor

Dr. Wynne Armand is a physician at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), where she provides primary care; an assistant professor in medicine at Harvard Medical School; and associate director of the MGH Center for the Environment and … See Full Bio View all posts by Wynne Armand, MD

Editor's note: Health inequities have long been an issue for people in the LGBTQ+ community. We're pleased to share a post from our colleagues in Corporate Learning at Harvard Medical School focusing on solutions that health care leaders can champion.

Health care business professionals can improve patient outcomes and reduce health inequities by championing the health care needs of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or questioning, intersex, asexual, and two-spirit (LGBTQIA2+) community. These issues are an important priority for health care professionals year-round, not just during Pride Month.

Research shows that the LGBTQIA2+ community faces disproportionate adverse health conditions due to health inequities. It’s important for those working in the health care industry to be aware of the challenges the LGBTQIA2+ community faces to help make systemic changes and improve health outcomes.

The LGBTQIA2+ community — which is less likely to trust the health care system — is a rising part of the population. The 2022 national Gallup survey shows that at least 20% of Gen Z identifies as LGBTQIA2+. This includes our coworkers, customers, and clients, says Dr. Alex Keuroghlian, a psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital and faculty advisor for LGBT and Allies at Harvard Medical School (LAHMS).

“LGBTQIA2+ people experience pervasive stigma and discrimination, as well as numerous adverse social determinants of health, all of which negatively impact health outcomes,” says Dr. Keuroghlian. “Health care professionals, organizations, and governmental agencies need to intentionally provide clinical care and design health systems and policies, in a manner that is culturally responsive and improves health outcomes for LGBTQIA2+ people.”

Due to the politicized nature of these issues, health care providers around the world, including in several U.S. states, face limitations and backlash when providing gender-affirming care. In some places, Dr. Keuroghlian says, “legal restrictions on access to gender-affirming care create challenges for clinicians to deliver this care and for transgender and gender diverse people to safely receive it.”

Everyone in health care — including health care business professionals — can work to improve health outcomes and decrease inequities. “It is critical for all businesses to offer welcoming, inclusive, and affirming work environments and service delivery for LGBTQIA2+ people,” Dr. Keuroghlian says.

Supporting LGBTQIA2+ health begins in the workplace

With thoughtful action, health care business professionals can contribute to greater health equity for these underserved individuals. Some ways to do so include:

1. Take an active interest in better understanding the needs and perspectives of the LGBTQIA2+ community.

Conducting research, including surveys and consumer focus groups, is a good way to help better understand specific health needs and priorities. “This community has historically been excluded from studies and research that would be very helpful in understanding their needs and their challenges,” says Dr. Enrique Caballero, an endocrinologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the faculty director of International Innovation Programs in the HMS Office for External Education. “We need to get to know the population better.”

2. Prioritize inclusive language.

Whether you are involved directly in care delivery or other aspects of health care, pay attention to the words you use — for both customers and employees. Gendered language in job postings, informational or marketing materials, and even casual conversation can be off-putting. That means lost opportunities for organizations and LGBTQIA2+ individuals. Slight shifts in language and conscious efforts like adding pronouns to your email signature speak volumes.

3. Train staff to be community allies.

Gaining awareness of our unconscious biases and making shifts in our everyday language doesn’t happen overnight. Health care industry businesses can help their staff be better allies to the LGBTQIA2+ community by providing access to workshops delivered by community members.

“No one becomes fully competent after one conversation, lecture, or video,” Dr. Caballero says. “It’s a lifelong process in which we all learn how to be more respectful, inclusive, and to embrace diversity.”

4. Support companies and community organizations that focus on LGBTQIA2+ health.

Show, don’t tell. Making financial contributions to organizations already on the ground and working with this population demonstrates that you aren’t just concerned about the bottom line. You are truly dedicated to helping the LGBTQ+ population access good health care.

5. Hire LGBTQIA2+ staff.

The best way to ensure your company is prioritizing health equity is by having a diverse group at the decision-making table. It is crucial to have employees that represent the diversity of your customer base — not only diversity in gender expression and sexuality, but also diversity in race, ethnicity, age, ability, and beyond.

“Part of our obligation is to really open the doors for everybody,” Dr. Caballero says. “Talent is not exclusive to a particular group, and I think that is important to embrace as an organization.”

6. Include LGBTQIA2+ representation in all communications.

Diverse representation is key. Make a pointed effort to include same-sex couples, non-traditional family units, and transgender and non-binary individuals in all kinds of communications, participating in everyday activities.

7. Acknowledge any missteps.

On an institutional level, company acknowledgments can go a long way in rebuilding trust with the LGBTQIA2+ community. Within the organization, it’s valuable to encourage ongoing communication about company culture.

“All organizations should have a system in place for people to provide feedback on how things are going and to report anything that they want to call the leadership team's attention to,” Dr. Caballero says. “Having a system that truly listens to members of the organization — and being sure that follow-up action is taken — is very important.”

8. Make action consistent beyond Pride Month.

Embracing the LGBTQIA2+ community consistently and with commitment all year long “is truly an opportunity for everyone,” Dr. Caballero says. “This is not good just for the members of the community, but for everybody that works in a place that embraces diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Industry professionals turn to HMS for custom corporate learning programs, including on topics like LGBTQIA2+ health, that leave a lasting impact on participants. To provide these programs, HMS leverages faculty expertise from throughout the School and the entire Harvard University community to share with health care teams. To learn about HMS Corporate Learning custom programs, read about the approach or hear from clients themselves.

About the Author

Corporate Learning Staff

Harvard Medical School’s Corporate Learning solutions provide emerging and established companies with the knowledge they need to address the industry's toughest business challenges. Their extensive portfolio of learning solutions helps teams achieve their potential by advancing … See Full Bio View all posts by Corporate Learning Staff

Do you ever read the notes written by your doctor or health practitioner during a medical visit? If not, you might want to check them out. Usually, these medical notes are full of helpful insights about your health and reminders of recommendations discussed. And there’s medicalese, of course: hard-to-pronounce illnesses, medications, and technical terms.

But you may be surprised to see incorrect information or unexpected language, tone, or even innuendo. Was your past medical history really that “unremarkable”? Did you actually “deny” drinking alcohol? Did the note describe you as “unreliable”?

Here’s how to decipher unfamiliar lingo, understand some surprising descriptions, and flag any errors you find.

What’s in a medical note?

A standard medical note has several sections. These include

• a description of current symptoms
• past medical problems
• a list of medications taken
• family medical history
• social habits such as smoking, drinking alcohol, or drug use
• details of the physical examination
• test results
• a discussion of the big picture, along with recommendations for further evaluation or treatment.

Notes tend to be more complete for a new patient or annual exam. Follow-up notes may not cover all of these points.

What’s potentially confusing about medical notes?

Most medical notes aren’t written using plain language because they aren’t intended primarily for a nonmedical audience. So it’s common to run across:

• Medical jargon: You had an upset stomach and a fever. Doctors may say “dyspepsia” (upset stomach) and “febrile” (fever).
• Complicated disease names: Ever heard of “multicentric reticulohistiocytosis” or “progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy?” These are just two of thousands of examples.
• Use of common language in uncommon ways: For example, your medical history might be called “unremarkable” and test results called "within normal limits” rather than “normal.”
• Abbreviations: You might see “VSS” and “RRR,” meaning “vital signs stable” with a pulse that has a “regular rate and rhythm.”

If you’re having trouble deciphering a note or understanding your health issues, tests, and recommendations, check in with your doctor’s office for clarifications. The more you understand about your health and your options for care, the better.

What if a medical note is incorrect?

Minor errors in medical notes are not rare: maybe you had your tonsils removed 30 years ago, not 10 years ago. But there can be more important errors: stating that arthritis in your left knee is severe when it’s actually the right knee that’s severe could lead to having x-rays (or even surgery!) on the wrong side. And not properly recording a family history of cancer or heart disease could mean missing out on timely screening tests or preventive treatments.

In an era of ever-increasing time pressure, use of voice recognition software, electronic record templates, drop-down menus, and ability to copy and paste text, it’s easier than ever for health care providers to make (and perpetuate) errors in the medical record.

If you do see an important error that could affect your health, ask your provider to amend it.

What if the language in a medical note seems offensive?

Numerous studies have highlighted the problem of stigmatizing language in medical notes that can leave people feeling judged or offended. Negative attitudes can affect the quality of our health care and willingness to seek care, and can also widen health disparities. One study linked stigmatizing language to higher rates of medical errors. Of note, this study found higher rates of stigmatizing language and medical error among black patients.

Examples include:

• Depersonalization: A note might describe a patient as “a drug abusing addict” rather than a person struggling with drug addiction.
• Insulting or inappropriate descriptors: Notes might contain subjective descriptions that paint the patient in an unflattering light without providing context. For example, the note might say “the patient is unkempt and is drug-seeking” rather than “the patient is experiencing homelessness and has severe, chronic pain.” If a person’s recall of medical events from the past is hazy, they may be called “unreliable.”
• Dismissiveness: A medical note may suggest a symptom is not real or is exaggerated, rather than taking the complaint seriously.
• An untrusting tone: Language such as “she claims she never drinks” or “he denies alcohol use” may suggest mistrust by the physician.

Why might this happen, anyway?

How does such language make its way into medical notes? (To be clear, these possible explanations are not justifications.)

• Tradition and training: Medical trainees, like other learners, tend to follow the lead of their mentors. So if stigmatizing language is used by an instructor, trainees may do the same.
• Time pressure: With medical documentation (as in most everything else), mistakes are more common if you’re rushing.
• Bias: Like everyone else, doctors have biases, including ones they aren’t aware of. How we are taught to think about people — by family, by society — can spill over into every area of life, including work.
• Frustration: Doctors may feel frustrated by patients who don’t follow their recommendations. That frustration can be reflected in their medical notes. For example, a note may say, “As expected, the patient’s blood sugar is high; he is still not checking his blood sugar or following the diet recommended by his nutritionist.”

If the language in a note is confusing or bothersome, ask about it. The Open Notes movement and federal legislation have given most of us much better access to our medical records. This has worthy goals — greater transparency and better communication with people about their medical care — and unintended consequences.

Is changing language in notes that health practitioners once shared mainly with each other a positive consequence? Mostly. Yet some doctors worry that notes will become less specific, accurate, or useful since they may leave out information that might upset a patient.

The bottom line

I encourage you to read your health providers’ notes about your care. If there is a substantial error or something you find confusing or objectionable, ask about it. By the way, a signed medical note cannot usually be revised. However, your doctor can make clarifications or correct mistakes in an addendum at the end of the note.

As more and more patients read their medical notes, it’s likely that health providers will be more conscientious about the language they use. So, wide access to medical notes may improve not only people’s understanding of their health, but also the quality of notes over time.

It's worth remembering that the medical note is not the most important thing that happens during a visit to your doctor. A great note isn’t the same as great care, and vice versa. Still, your medical notes can be a valuable source of health information that differs from all others, including trusted health sites and social media: they’re written by your doctor and they’re all about you.

About the Author

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Robert H. Shmerling is the former clinical chief of the division of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and is a current member of the corresponding faculty in medicine at Harvard Medical School. … See Full Bio View all posts by Robert H. Shmerling, MD

When cancer patients are treated with radiation, it’s possible that the therapy itself may cause new tumors to form in the body later. Radiation kills cancer cells by damaging their DNA, but if the treatments cause genetic damage to normal cells near the radiation target, there’s a small risk that these secondary malignancies may arise over time.

Just over 10 years ago, Canadian researchers set out to assess the risk of secondary malignancy among men with prostate cancer who were treated with a type of radiation called brachytherapy. Unlike radiation delivered from sources outside the body, brachytherapy is accomplished by implanting dozens of radioactive pellets, or “seeds,” directly into the tumor site. Those seeds, which are never removed, emit radiation at a dose that declines toward zero over the course of a year.

Brachytherapy has the advantage of convenience. Instead of traveling for repeat sessions of radiation, men need only one treatment, usually given in an outpatient setting. But brachytherapy is also falling out of favor, in part because newer types of external beam radiation deliver high-precision doses with fewer side effects.

Study methodology and results

The Canadian study compared rates of secondary malignancies in the pelvis among men treated either with brachytherapy or with surgery to remove the prostate. All the treatments took place in British Columbia between 1998 and 2000. The brachytherapy group included 2,418 men with an average age of 66, while the surgically-treated group contained 4,015 men whose average age was 62. Within that group, 2,643 men had been treated with surgery alone, and 1,372 men with surgery plus external beam radiation given later.

After median follow-ups of between 5.8 years (brachytherapy) and 6.4 years (surgery), the study team reported in 2014 that there was no difference in rates of secondary malignancies between the groups, or with cancer incidence in the general population.

But that’s no longer the case: In April 2024, the researchers published updated findings. This time, rates of new cancers in the pelvis — including the bladder and rectum — were higher in the brachytherapy group. Specifically, 6.4% of brachytherapy-treated men had secondary malignancies at 15 years of follow-up, increasing to 9.8% after 20 years. By contrast, 3.2% and 4.2% of surgically-treated men developed secondary pelvic malignancies over the same durations. There was no difference in deaths from secondary malignancies between the groups.

The strength of the association with bladder cancer in particular is “similar to that seen with smoking,” wrote the author of an accompanying editorial. Results from the study “should be considered when treating men with localized prostate cancer who have a long life expectancy,” the authors concluded.

Commentary from experts

“I do believe that this study reveals a dark truth about radiation for prostate cancer that has been long suspected,” says Dr. Anthony Zietman, a professor of radiation oncology at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, and a member of the advisory and editorial board for the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases. “As the decades pass after radiation therapy of any kind — brachytherapy or external beam — the risk for radiation-induced malignancies rises.

“These malignancies are usually in adjacent organs like the bladder and rectum, or within the prostate itself. They may be very curable, and thus the survival rates are the same for radiation or surgically treated patients, but there is little doubt that, for these patients, they represent a ‘sting in the tail’ long after the radiation has been given and forgotten. This data certainly gives us pause when offering radiation to very young men with several decades of life expectancy ahead of them, and it also reminds us of the value of follow-up visits.”

“The fact that second cancers arise in the area where radiation was given is not surprising, but the magnitude of the long-term increases is concerning,” added Dr. Marc Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and editor in chief of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases. “There are other common and troublesome urinary side effects of brachytherapy — independent of second cancers — that patients should fully consider before selecting it as a treatment option. This is especially true given the availability of other convenient and similarly effective prostate cancer therapies.”

About the Author

Charlie Schmidt, Editor, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases

Charlie Schmidt is an award-winning freelance science writer based in Portland, Maine. In addition to writing for Harvard Health Publishing, Charlie has written for Science magazine, the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Environmental Health Perspectives, … See Full Bio View all posts by Charlie Schmidt

About the Reviewer

Marc B. Garnick, MD, Editor in Chief, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Marc B. Garnick is an internationally renowned expert in medical oncology and urologic cancer. A clinical professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, he also maintains an active clinical practice at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical … See Full Bio View all posts by Marc B. Garnick, MD